A DIRECTOR of a security firm has been jailed for seven years for the "inhumane" torture of a vulnerable young man despite an Edinburgh councillor's plea for him to be freed.
John Lindsay and two accomplices subjected Jamie Alexander to a terrifying 90-minute ordeal in July last year.
The badly beaten 20-year-old had boiling water poured over him before he was dumped in a kennel with two large dogs.
The victim, who was also burned with cigarettes, had wandered into Lindsay's unlocked home in Edinburgh. He had lost his train ticket and was looking for directions.
Lindsay yesterday returned to the High Court in Glasgow after previously admitting to the savage attack.
David Walker, the member for Craigmillar and Portobello, had written a letter on the council's headed notepaper asking for the 52-year-old to be spared jail.
However, the judge described the plea as preposterous and said he had never "seen anything more ridiculous" in his legal career.
Lord Turnbull added at the time: "This is an act of barbaric torture over a prolonged period of time on a vulnerable young man. This councillor proposes it should be dealt with by a non-custodial sentence. What troubles me is the way in which this individual does so in his public capacity."
Lord Turnbull ordered his clerk to make Walker aware of the full facts of the case and asked for an apology.
Lindsay was also ordered to pay his victim £5000 in compensation. The judge said he had behaved in an inhumane manner which involved the humiliation of his victim.
He also told Lindsay, director of JSL Security Services said that given his background "taking the law into his own hands" made the offence more serious.
It is believed the councillor has written to apologise.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article