A SENIOR UN humanitarian official has warned of the risk of genocide in the Central African Republic unless there is a massive increase in the international response to the crisis.
The country descended into chaos last year after Muslim rebel coalition Séléka seized power, unleashing a wave of killings and looting that in turn sparked revenge attacks by a Christian militia.
John Ging, director of operations for the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, told a news conference in Geneva yesterday: "It has all the elements that we have seen elsewhere, in places like Rwanda and Bosnia.
"The elements are there, the seeds are there, for a genocide. There's no question about that."
Mr Ging, who recently returned from a five-day trip to the country, said the crisis was foreseen, avoidable and produced by the international community's neglect over many years.
A UN human rights spokesman said earlier this week intercommunal violence had risen to "extraordinary vicious levels" but Mr Ging said it was incorrect to describe the situation as intercommunal violence, although an extremely violent minority were intent on inciting a wider conflict.
He added: "The communities are not in conflict with each other. There are people from each of the communities who are conducting atrocities against people from the other community. And they are doing it in the name of their communities, but they're not representing their communities."
He said the population of 4.5 million was being polarised. In the town of Bossangoa, some of the country's 866,000 displaced people were living in camps within sight of their homes, but were "subsisting in squalor" because they were too scared to go home.
Mr Ging said the country was now little more than a territory on a map, without the infrastructure of a state.
The police force and army have disintegrated, leaving 1600 French and 4000 African Union peacekeepers to try to prevent further outbreaks of violence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article