More than £1.1 billion has been invested in frontline care over the past five years, thanks to efficiency savings in the NHS, according to a report.
Last year, health boards across Scotland managed to save £270 million - beating their target of making savings of 3%.
Health Secretary Alex Neil praised NHS staff for finding "innovative ways" of saving cash as he confirmed the health service was on track to meet its efficiency target for this year.
Savings have been made by measures such as reducing bureaucracy and improving practices to free up more time for patient care.
A new IT system to manage patient transport has helped the Scottish Ambulance Service save more than £2.5m while a change in practices at Hairmyres Hospital has led to 52% of patients seen by a cardiologist in the accident and emergency department be discharged, rather than wait to be transferred to a cardiology ward.
Portable oxygen cylinders have saved NHS Scotland £600,000 and allowed patients to be more mobile.
Speaking after the savings were revealed in the Quality and Efficiency Support Team (QuEST) annual report, Mr Neil said: "This report shows us that NHS boards are continuing to find new and innovative ways to save money to reinvest in frontline services - where it is needed most. By reinvesting this money we are able to deliver real changes for patients, like investing in our workforce to see Scotland have more qualified nurses per head of population than England."
He added: "While we are striving to become more efficient with taxpayers' money we remain committed to protecting spending on health and our latest £12.1bn resource budget reflects a funding increase in real terms for both 2014-15 and 2015-16."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article