Independence could help secure a Labour government in Scotland in 2016, the chairman of campaign group Yes Scotland has told the party's supporters.
Former Labour MP Dennis Canavan said a Yes vote in the referendum would not represent a change in party allegiance to the SNP, but could instead herald the return of Labour to power in the first elections for an independent Scottish Parliament.
Addressing a rally in Glasgow organised by Labour for Independence, Mr Canavan said: "By asking Labour voters to vote Yes in the referendum, we are not asking them to change their party allegiance.
"A Yes vote is not a vote for Alex Salmond or a vote for the SNP. On the contrary, independence could help secure the election of a Labour government in Scotland.
"Labour supporters can vote Yes in the referendum and then vote Labour in the first elections to the Scottish Parliament in 2016.
"Independence would mean that an independent Scottish Labour Party would be able to respond more readily to the needs and aspirations of the people of Scotland. That would help to bring about policies based on Labour's traditional values of social justice and solidarity."
Allan Grogan, founder and leader of Labour for Independence, said: "An independent Scottish Labour Party can reject regressive policies of Westminster - which will lead to greater social equality and opportunities to end poverty in Scotland."
Mr Canavan's comments follow remarks from former politician Jim Sillars, who believes Labour could be the first to run an independent Scottish government.
Mr Sillars, who is a former Labour and SNP MP who retains SNP membership, said he and others may join Labour if it ''rediscovers'' its socialism after a Yes vote on September 18.
A Better Together spokesman said: "This organisation has been exposed as nothing more than a sham group fronted by SNP councillors.
"With polls showing that around a third of SNP voters want to stay in the UK, the nationalists should look a little closer to home."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article