THE embattled Environment Agency (EA) has put on hold plans to cut jobs as southern England continued to deal with the flooding crisis.
The organisation has come under fire over its response to the floods and the failure to dredge the flood-hit Somerset Levels after Labour said 550 flood specialists were at risk of redundancy.
But yesterday, the EA said this was not currently under consideration and discussions about who would be affected would be delayed until "current flooding has subsided".
Yesterday, the Duke of Cambridge and Prince Harry joined members of the armed forces in helping with the supply of sandbags to defend Datchet, Berkshire. The Queen has also contributed feed and bedding from Windsor to help affected farmers on the Somerset Levels.
With further heavy rain and storms are predicted, warnings were in place for heavy rainfall, gale-force winds and snow, which could pile on the problems for areas already struggling in the wake of record wet weather and a string of wild winter storms.
More than 1000 homes have been evacuated in the Thames Valley and the West Country, and others have been left without electricity. Ongoing flooding could continue to affect homes, businesses and land for at least another week, the Environment Agency said. Several severe flood warnings - meaning risk to life - were in force along the River Thames, the Severn at Gloucester, on the Somerset Levels and on the south coast, and there were hundreds more warnings and alerts across England and Wales.
Windsor, Maidenhead, parts of Surrey and communities in Buckinghamshire, West Berkshire and Reading are at risk from the River Thames, which has seen levels rise to 60-year highs, and significant flooding is expected.
Severe gales, large waves and high sea levels are threatening coastal flooding on the Dorset coast, while the south coast from Cornwall to East Sussex is also at an increased risk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article