SO near and yet so far.
The proximity of the two Cabinets was an intriguing coincidence.
It enabled David Cameron to visit an oil rig and insist that the UK Government really cared about Scotland; that biggest was best and the UK's deep pockets meant it was best-placed to develop the industry.
But it also gave Alex Salmond the opportunity to dismiss the casual jet-set from the south, denouncing them as oil and gas "thieves", and to insist that Scotland would nurture its North Sea bonanza and, pointing to Norway, declare that small was, in fact, beautiful with the prospect of a Norwegian-style oil fund worth £30 billion over a generation if Scots voted Yes.
The numbers and arguments around oil and gas are bamboozling for voters, who, week in and week out, are served a dose of statistics to paint a black and white picture; to "prove" that the resources of the North Sea are a) a volatile and reducing commodity and it would be madness to base your economic future on it and b) there are decades more of the black gold underground that would help ease the birth of a newly independent Scotland.
Of course, both can be true. Oil and gas prices do go up and go down; they've been as low as $25 a barrel and as high as $150 over the past decade or so. The amount of reserves underground is limited; the Office for Budget Responsibility predicts oil revenue will drop 38% by 2017/18.
But would you rather it was there than not? Of course, you would. The Scottish Government, leaning heavily on the upper estimates, points out there will be £57bn in tax revenue by 2018. And having a plan to maximise how much revenue can be extracted is a no-brainer, whoever gets to manage it in the years ahead.
Oil expert Sir Ian Wood, whose report published yesterday was endorsed by both governments, said greater co-operation and collaboration should be used to get resources out of the ground.
We were originally told some 12bn barrels of oil, worth a not immodest £1 trillion, lay underground. But Sir Ian suggested that this was at the lower end and that, if things went well, it could be double this; 24bn barrels worth £2tr.
Now, taxpayers will not get to see anything like this amount but, even so, Sir Ian said that it should be possible to deliver at least three to four billion more barrels over the next 20 years - worth around £200bn to the future economy, whether Scottish or British.
But the problem for ordinary folk facing the polling booth on September 18 is that you cannot travel down two roads at once to see which one ends up at the better destination and this fact will more times than not help - by instilling doubt, those who urge people to stick with the path they are currently on - particularly given the rocky road we have all just had to endure.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article