The lawyer dubbed the "Witchfinder General" has made a robust defence of the courts in the wake of a series of high-profile acquittals in celebrity sex trials.
Nazir Afzal, chief Crown prosecutor for the north-west of England, who put Coronation Street's William Roache in the dock, said the authorities would prosecute if the evidence was there - irrespective of who the defendant was - in cases of historic sex abuse.
"This is not some witch hunt. Criminal justice is not a ducking-stool, it is due process. It is a collection of evidence, scrutiny of evidence, presentation of evidence, the testing of that evidence and determination by a jury," he said.
Mr Afzal said in each case, no matter who the complainant or accused was, the same test applied in deciding whether a case went to court: "Is there sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction and is it in the public interest to do so?
"The threshold has not changed. Time is not barrier to justice being delivered. It is for Parliament to determine there should be a limitation on cases being brought to court. Parliament has decided there is no limitation on these types of cases and that must be right.
"Our test is the realistic prospect of conviction, it's not the same as 'This man is guilty': that is a judgment only a jury can make. Nobody is above the law in this country. We apply the code, the law, to everybody."
Mr Afzal said that as a chief prosecutor he was "damned if I do and damned if I don't" in deciding whether a case goes to court.
Speaking at a conference on sexual abuse in Manchester, he said it was important to prosecute cases of historic abuse regardless of the passage of time for the sake of the victims.
"Time is not a healer," he said. "Justice delayed, evidently, is better than justice denied. "
He said that for generations children, very often the victims of sexual abuse, had been told they should be seen and not heard and it took "enormous courage" to eventually come forward.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article