THREE Scottish councils have backed away from legal action against Police Scotland after the force withdrew traffic warden services.
Borders, Falkirk and Stirling Council had considered suing after running out of time to replace traffic wardens, which were previously run by police forces ion their areas.
However, the threat has been lifted after more time was given to come up with a way round the dispute.
The row was sparked after Police Scotland announced in October last year that traffic wardens were to be phased out to save money and standardise services.
Traffic warden services in Scotland have been run by police in some local authority areas, while others took control decades ago.
Police Scotland wished to see all services operating at the same level, but this was opposed by the three councils and will now be postponed for two months.
Stirling Council's Public Safety Committee Convenor Councillor Martin Earl said: "The way Police Scotland has gone about this has shown scant regard for proper consultation with local councils or the impact of withdrawal of traffic wardens on the public.
"It is surely wrong for Police Scotland to pick and choose which laws it will enforce.
Assistant Chief Constable Wayne Mawson said: "Discussions are ongoing with local authorities who have corresponded with us over the change of traffic warden provision.
"In those areas where traffic warden service has been withdrawn, police officers have continued to work with local stakeholders to identify areas affected by problematic parking, targeting them during periods of directed action."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article