A BALLOT that was to have finally completed a controversial community buyout has been called off following a hitch in negotiations.
Papers were due to be sent out yesterday to the crofting community on the Pairc Estate on Lewis in a move which was expected to bring an end to the most protracted and acrimonious buyout of its kind in the last 20 years.
It came about after terms of a voluntary transfer of the estate to the community were negotiated between the Pairc Trust and landowner Barry Lomas, who had originally been unwilling to sell.
But unless the setback can be resolved, the issue could yet be destined for the courts as Scotland's first hostile community buyout.
Angus McDowall, Chairman of Pairc Trust, said: "We regret that it has not been possible to finalise the documentation by the due date, and we have no option but to call off the ballot."
The Pairc Trust had made clear it was willing to pursue the first "hostile" buyout under the Scottish Parliament's land reform laws, in which the landowner was unwilling to sell.
Mr Lomas, of Leamington Spa, mounted a legal challenge in the Court of Session. However three judge dismissed his appeal.
But after 11 years it looked as though residents in the South Lochs area of the island were finally going to buy the 26,800-acre estate for an agreed price of £500,000 and the ballot was organised. The result was expected to give final community endorsement to the plan.
Mr McDowall said discussions were ongoing with the estate and if they could be satisfactorily resolved in the next few weeks, another ballot would be arranged.
But he said: "If it is not possible to resolve the issues, we will have to abandon the Amicable Estate Transfer route and rely on the Courts to determine the outcome of our applications to buy the Estate under Part Three of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act."
Mr Lomas said: "A great deal of work has gone into this already, so I don't want to comment at this stage."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article