CAMPAIGNERS have launched a petition calling for US whistleblower Edward Snowden to be given political asylum in an independent Scotland.
The petition, which was lodged before the Scottish Parliament last week, states that Snowden is owed a "debt of gratitude" for revealing information on the "surveillance" of emails and text messages by British and US security organisations.
It urges the Scottish Government to offer Snowden asylum in the event of a Yes vote, which it says would encourage whistleblowers everywhere to take a stance and signal a "clean break with the intrusiveness of the UK security state".
Fugitive former National Security Agency systems analyst Snowden, who was elected rector of Glasgow University last month, is living in Russia where he has been given temporary asylum. In 2013, US authorities filed criminal charges against him including espionage and theft of government property.
The petition, which has gathered more than 250 signatures, was submitted by Mick Napier, a former university lecturer and campaigner with the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
He said: "Edward Snowden deserves this because he has done nothing wrong, he has provided us all with a service. Snowden is the elected rector of Glasgow University by democratic ballot and therefore there is something peculiar about the elected rector of Glasgow University, one of our most prestigious Scottish universities, being a fugitive in Russia.
"Conditional upon a Yes vote, we would like the offer (of asylum in Scotland) to be made right away."
Yvonne Ridley, the former journalist captured by the Taliban, who now lives in the Borders, is among those backing the petition.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We cannot comment on individual cases.
"Asylum is granted within the terms of relevant international law to those fleeing persecution or serious harm in their own country and in need of international protection, and an independent Scotland would consider each case on its own merits."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article