FORMER deputy speaker Nigel Evans has entered the witness box and told a jury that he had not raped or sexually assaulted anyone.
The 56-year-old is alleged to have sexually assaulted seven young men on various dates between 2002 and last year by using his "powerful" political influence to take advantage of them, often while drunk.
In his trial at Preston Crown Court he denies one rape, two indecent assaults, five sexual assaults and one attempted sexual assault.
His barrister, Peter Wright QC, asked him: "Have you sexually assaulted anyone in terms of the allegations set out here, Mr Evans?"
The Swansea-born MP replied: "No, Mr Wright."
Mr Wright then asked: "Have you raped anyone?"
Mr Evans repeated: "No, Mr Wright."
Addressing the rape claim, Mr Wright said: "The principal allegation here that you face is having raped and sexually assaulted a young man. Did you have sexual contact with him?"
The MP said: "Yes, I did."
Mr Wright said: "Was it with or without his consent?" The MP said: "Absolutely with consent."
The MP also denied that he committed two further sexual assaults against the rape complainant on the same night.
Mr Evans spoke of his "co-ordinated" revelation in December 2010 that he was gay. He told the jury: "I struggled with it over many years, whether I should come out or not. My mum was in her 80s, there was no right time. I just did not want to upset her. I didn't know how she would take it."
He continued: "When she died on March 27 2009 that was a period for me to start to reflect when it was an appropriate time to finally come out at some stage."
He said that, following his decision to go public, he informed his family, members of his constituency association and Prime Minister David Cameron.
The trial continues
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article