The mother of murdered schoolgirl Sarah Payne has given evidence in the hacking trial and said the News of the World was often a force for good.
Sara Payne said former editor Rebekah Brooks and retired managing editor Stuart Kuttner had lent their support after her eight-year-old daughter was abducted and murdered in 2000.
She told jurors at the Old Bailey that Brooks was at the forefront of the long-running Sarah's Law campaign to protect children from predatory paedophiles.
Mrs Payne said: "It's easy to forget in these dark times the NotW has often been a force for good and it has something to do with the people who worked on it."
She added: "I do not pretend they are perfect or always got things right," before describing Kuttner as a gentleman and Brooks as "really sweet".
She told how they worked as a team on Sarah's Law, sharing their research.
She said: "I did not sleep. I could call at two o'clock in the morning and she would pick up the phone."
Mrs Payne, who was called by Kuttner's legal team as a character witness, said he helped steer her through the newspaper industry and meeting politicians as part of the campaign.
Brooks, 45, Kuttner, 74, and all of their co-defendants deny the charges against them.
When Kuttner returned to the witness box to continue his evidence, he denied holding back a possible lead in the disappearance of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.
Private investigator Glenn Mulcaire hacked into Milly's phone for the NotW after she went missing in 2002, the court heard.
Kuttner alerted police to a voicemail message suggesting Milly may be alive, said prosecutor Andrew Edis, QC, but only after journalists had been dispatched in an attempt to track her down.
Cross-examining, Mr Edis asked Kuttner: "How did you think the NotW had come by the message?"
Kuttner said: "I have no recollection."
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article