SCOTS should not presume that "free and unfettered" access to all BBC services would continue if there is a "Yes" vote in the referendum, a former member of the corporation's governing body has warned.
Jeremy Peat, who has served as a member of the BBC Trust, claimed if Scotland left the UK a deal would have to be done to ensure this.
He said otherwise digital television services could potentially be "cut off" just over the border "so essentially there could be a removal of access for the great majority to that television".
The Scottish Government's White Paper on independence states that "Scottish viewers and listeners should continue to have access to all their current channels" and also sets out that there should be "no additional cost to viewers and listeners as a consequence of independence".
Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop last year insisted viewers north of the border would still be able to watch the same TV programmes they currently enjoy after independence without having to pay a higher licence fee.
But Mr Peat told MSPs on Holyrood's Education and Culture Committee: "I don't think there can be the presumption that access would continue on a free and unfettered basis to all services."
He was questioned by the committee on access to BBC services post-independence, with Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur asking: "What is your assessment as to what is likely to happen in the event of a Yes vote?"
Mr Peat told him: "So far as access to BBC services is concerned post-independence, my understanding is DTT (digital terrestrial television) could be cut off close to the border."
BBC Scotland currently provides programmes that are broadcast across the UK on the BBC network, and the White Paper proposes an independent Scotland would set up a Scottish Broadcasting Service (SBS) which would enter into a formal relationship with the BBC so this would be able to be continued.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article