ONE of the architects of devolution has come out in support of a Yes vote in the referendum.
Canyon Kenyon Wright says independence is needed to complete "unfinished business and allow the new Scotland of our hopes to emerge".
Until now, Wright has argued for an overhaul of the Union to give Holyrood more powers, but has stopped short of fully backing independence.
However in a letter to the Sunday Herald, the former chair of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, which drew up the blueprint for the Scottish Parliament in the 1990s, declares himself firmly behind a Yes in September.
Although he lives in England and so will not have a vote in September, Wright, a retired Episcopalian clergyman, remains a central figure in the constitutional debate.
He says his has been "a long and difficult journey" from devolution to Independence.
"For many years I held out the naive 'triumph of hope over experience' that the UK Parliament might be ready to reform itself radically to recognise Scotland's real autonomy," he writes. "That door has been slammed shut.
"There is now only one way to finish that business - it must be Yes."
Wright says the Constitutional Convention "failed to achieve its aims" in key respects, such as leaving Westminster with ultimate power over Holyrood and failing to set a new course to achieve "better governance, participative politics and a remodelled democracy".
He says: "Of course there is no guarantee that independence will achieve these things, but it certainly is unattainable without it.
"The present devolved parliament is a great improvement on the bankrupt Westminster system, but it still has to operate within the straitjacket of the system's assumptions.
"We need the freedom to shape our own destiny, make our won rules, and make our own mistakes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article