YOUNGSTERS and their parents would benefit from changing Scotland's "ambiguous" laws on smacking, children's campaigners have said.
Jackie Brock, the chief executive of Children in Scotland, said the country is "increasingly out of step" with other nations in Europe on the protection offered to children.
Anne Houston, of Children 1st, said change is needed to help make Scotland the "best place for children to grow up".
They were speaking after Staffan Janson, a Swedish expert on children's well-being, told how banning smacking had brought about a culture change in his country.
Sweden was the first country in the world to outlaw smacking in 1979. Mr Janson says parents now adopt different methods for disciplining their youngsters."
Mr Janson, a professor of social paediatrics at the University of Karlstadt and Orebo, told Holyrood's cross-party group on children and young people: "Scandinavian parents have learned in one generation to completely refrain from spanking their children."
Current law in Scotland bans parents from shaking their children, hitting them on the head or using implements to physically punish them. But they can argue that it was a "justifiable assault" if they punish a child by hitting them.
Ms Houston said: "It is incredible to think that we accept that the smallest and most vulnerable members of our society are the only ones whose assault is considered 'justifiable'.
"Today, we have heard how changing the law, along with providing support for parents to find other ways to discipline their children, not only protects children from assault but positively changes family relationships too."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it "does not support smacking". "However, we do not wish to criminalise parents for lightly smacking their child. The Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 clearly outlines what is unacceptable punishment," she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article