HUMAN beings need to stop prioritising themselves over the environment and help wildlife instead of "chasing cures for cancer", Springwatch presenter Chris Packham has said.
The outspoken naturalist, 53, also criticised Sir Richard Branson's "grotesquely misinformed" project to put lemurs on a Caribbean island, and said that Christianity "doesn't help" when it comes to getting people to change their attitude and think about the planet.
He told Radio Times magazine that risk aversion was "killing childhood", meaning that children who were free to explore nature on their own were now an "extinct" species.
The wildlife expert called on wealthy philanthropists to stop prioritising human health and to fund environmental causes instead.
He told the magazine that economic growth was "a recipe for disaster" and blasted "ill-informed" politicians.
"Because we're humans, we make the decisions. We've got to get to a state where we think about all life and not just human life," he said.
"Christianity doesn't help: we're made in God's image so everything is there to be exploited by us. It doesn't help people's attitudes."
But he said that he was "optimistic" about the future, adding: "Our understanding of what we need to do to preserve species is increasing.
"The reason why it's failing at the moment is that politicians - local, national, global - don't understand the need to look after our planet.
"Biological resources are worth trillions of dollars a year, when you think about the fish taken out of the sea, the forests cut down for wood, the oil pumped out of the ground. So, at a certain point the ecologists will have an equal say to the economists.
"If there's one mantra that we need to break in the next 10 years it's that economic growth is a good thing. It isn't. It's a recipe for global disaster."
He added: "What we need in the next 10 years - as a stop-gap - is corporate funding and the benevolence of philanthropists.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article