A BRAND new currency is the most likely option to be adopted by an independent Scotland, according to a new report by Barclays.
The bank also warned that a Norwegian-style oil fund, one of the SNP's flagship policies, would be difficult to replicate. Barclays said that it took no stand on whether or not Scots should vote for independence.
The bank's report looked at four potential options, including a formal currency union with the UK, an informal union or 'Sterlingisation', the euro and a new currency.
Formal and informal monetary union options were "more challenging than generally assumed", it found.
Scotland's finances would also make joining the euro "even more difficult", according to the report.
As a result, a separate currency for the newly independent state "may be the most likely" outcome.
The report also warns that Norway's multi-billion pound fund was created at a time when further oil production estimates were on the rise.
"The creation of a similar framework in Scotland would instead occur at a time when projected oil production is on a steep decline", it adds.
Scottish ministers maintain that a currency union is in the best interests of both Scotland and the remaining UK. But the Chancellor George Osborne has ruled out this option.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The pound is as much Scotland's as it is the rest of the UK's and a currency union, as this paper shows, is in the interests of the rest of the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article