PLANS by rebel councils to leave the organisation representing local authorities have brought Labour to the brink of civil war.
Senior figures within Labour-led councils have warned party colleagues who are considering walking away from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla) to "put up or shut up".
At a crunch meeting today it is understood Renfrewshire Council leader Mark MacMillan will face pressure to stand down as Cosla's Labour leader - in theory the party's most senior councillor in Scotland - if he intends to lead his authority out of the organisation.
West Dunbartonshire, Dumfries and Galloway, Inverclyde and West Lothian will also be warned by some Labour figures that walking out of Cosla will hand their political rivals in the SNP carte blanche to push through whatever policies they see fit, with withdrawals giving the Nationalists total control within the body.
If they all leave, Labour would control only eight of Cosla's remaining 24 authorities, having held the balance of power since the 2012 local elections.
Inverclyde has already held discussions about reversing its decision and is expected to stay on the basis of some changes to Cosla's constitution.
It comes on the back of a letter sent to all Labour-led councils by Glasgow's leader Gordon Matheson, who has been leading the revolt, informing them that, along with Aberdeen and South Lanarkshire, Glasgow has now disengaged and will not attend the meeting.
Glasgow, which claims Cosla's funding distribution denies it about £15 million, will brief three of the rebel councils on its alternative to Cosla plans in the coming weeks. It plans a meeting with Renfrewshire.
A formal notice to quit has already been submitted but has a year's lead-in period.
All three will have paid annual subscriptions for Cosla membership for 2014/2015, totalling about £600,000.
One senior local government figure said: "It's fair to say the wheels have come off Glasgow's attempt to de stabilise Cosla. The Glasgow alternative model to Cosla seems to have hit the buffers big time, with councils showing no appetite for it whatsoever."
A senior source in one Labour council added: "It's incompatible that Mark MacMillan can stay as Cosla Labour leader if Renfrewshire is walking.
"Why would you walk away? All you're doing is playing into Alex Salmond's hands, leaving Labour in local government weakened while centralisation isn't going away soon.
"The fall-out from the police and fire centralisation shows the need for there to be a challenge. And what if boundary changes come on to the agenda? Where does that leave the smaller councils outside Cosla?"
One Labour council leader added: "There's every chance Mark will be challenged for the leadership in June. Or Renfrewshire could be gone by then. It's a difficult time at this point but I think we'll get through it. I'd prefer we united together."
The row has centred on where the power lies within the organisation, how funding to local authorities is distributed and the overall effectiveness of the body.
Cosla president David O'Neill, himself a Labour councillor, said: "I do not want to see this in terms of a battle with winners and losers. What recent events have shown me is that some of our member councils were obviously unhappy with some of our practices. I have listened to these concerns and acted upon them."
Mr MacMillan was unavailable for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article