A PUBLIC inquiry will be held into a controversial wind farm planned by energy giant SSE in north west Sutherland.
Scottish ministers will take the final decision on the plan but after Highland councillors voted four to one to object to the £200m Strathy South wind farm, an inquiry is now inevitable.
The plan would see 47 turbines erected amid a massive area of moorland at the heart of the Flow Country. This area of Caithness and Sutherland is on the UK's tentative list for inscription as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, as one of the largest and most intact areas of blanket bog in the world.
However although the site is surrounded by environmental designations, it itself is not restricted.
More than 200 letters of objection were received, although there was support from two of the three local community councils because of the employment potential. Scottish Natural Heritage and RSPB Scotland had lodged objections on environmental grounds, including the impact on birds such as the hen harrier, golden eagle and the rare wood sandpiper with particular concern for the red-throated diver and greenshank.
But SSE insists the wind farm would be built on an area already badly damaged by commercial forestry plantation and, as a consequence, would help the restoration of the peatland.
Planning officials had recommended that that Highland Council's north area planning committee did not object on condition eight turbines were removed from the plan.
But Caithness councillor David Bremner said he thought the issues should be raised publicly at an inquiry rather than "behind closed doors".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article