UNIONS have reacted with anger after construction firms announced details of a compensation scheme for workers whose names were on a blacklist, saying the amount being offered was "grossly inadequate".
Eight companies said that following months of talks, the scheme had been finalised and was now open to applications.
Compensation will range from £4,000 where "minimal information" was held, to £20,000 for those whose entries included more details. The companies involved are Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Costain, Kier, Laing O'Rourke, Sir Robert McAlpine, Skanska UK and Vinci PLC. The blacklist, containing more than 3,200 names of mainly building workers, was discovered five years ago when offices of the Consulting Association were raided by the Information Commissioner.
The two sides are due in court next week, while unions maintain talks had broken down because of the "inadequate" amount of compensation being offered.
Steve Murphy, general secretary of UCATT, said: "This is a deeply cynical attempt by the blacklisting companies to try to prevent workers, who have had their lives ruined, getting justice."
Justin Bowden, GMB national officer, said: "To try and present such a grossly inadequate sum of money as meaningful compensation suggests they are sorry only they got caught."
A spokeswoman for the construction companies said: "The eight companies that have created The Construction Workers Compensation Scheme (TWCS) are disappointed the unions have chosen to take a negative stance on the development of the scheme which now reflects many of the changes they had called for."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article