RAIL safety is being compromised because of Government cutbacks, according to a TUC report.
Reduction in funding to Network Rail has led to staff shortages, less frequent inspections and the increasing use of workers on zero-hours contracts, the report said.
Rail employees said that when safety concerns were raised, they were rarely acted upon, and "as a result workers were much less likely to raise potential safety issues".
Based on interviews with rail workers, the report was carried out on behalf of the four unions behind the TUC's Action for Rail campaign (Aslef, RMT, TSSA and Unite) by the Working Lives Institute at London Metropolitan University.
The report said workers were worried a major accident could happen "as a result of the culture that has developed in rail maintenance where safety is threatened because of a lack of resources".
A total of 11 people gave views to the report compilers. Of these, five were NR staff, four were employed by contractors, one was an RMT trade union official and one was a TSSA official.
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady said: "When track workers - who see with their own eyes when safety corners are being cut - warn that a major accident could be just around the corner, it's time for ministers to wake up and act."
The RMT said: "Corners are being cut and essential maintenance work delayed as the obsession with meeting cuts and targets overrides the delivery of safe and efficient services."
A Department for Transport spokesman said: "Safety must be a top priority, and we look to NR and the ORR to ensure the rail network is run in a safe and reliable way."
NR said: "Despite this report being based on the views of just five of our 35,000-strong workforce, parts of it echo our own analysis."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article