A former police marksman is to be charged with murdering a robbery suspect in a landmark prosecution.
The ex-officer, who shot Azelle Rodney in 2005 after opening fire within a second of pulling up next to the car in which he was travelling, has been identified only as E7 after being granted anonymity during a public inquiry into the 24-year-old's death.
Mr Rodney's mother Susan Alexander said: "I am very pleased at the CPS's decision to prosecute the officer who killed my son. I have waited a long time to see this day and hope this prosecution will lead to justice for Azelle."
The 24-year-old died in Edgware, north London, after officers stopped the car in which he was travelling with two other men, fearing they were on their way to rob Colombian drug dealers and had a sub-machine gun.
Mr Rodney was hit six times: once in each arm and in the back, and fatally four times in the head.
The officer will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on September 10.
Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said: "The decision to prosecute was taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors. We have determined that there is a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest."
In recent years there have only been a handful of cases where police officers have been charged with murder while on active duty.
The three-month public inquiry into Mr Rodney's death, chaired by former judge Sir Christopher Holland, found his killing was not justified.
Scotland Yard would not comment specifically on the case, but stressed its marksmen rarely fire their guns.
"Our officers are highly-trained and professional and fire shots only once or twice a year," the force said. "We accept that where this happens, our officers will be subject to detailed scrutiny."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article