MORE than half of police officers questioned in a survey say they have been injured by their uniform.
Back pain, hip injuries, rashes, sciatica and stomach pains have all been caused by what they claim are ill-fitting uniforms.
Officers also said body armour led to "excessive sweating" and skin rashes.
Six out of 10 respondents to the poll, carried out by Dundee University, said they had suffered "pain or injury" as a result of their uniform.
Some 28 per cent said their uniform had made existing injuries worse or had delayed their recuperation, while more than half said the uniform hindered their ability to do their jobs properly.
Officers said ill-fitting stab-proof vests, body armour, utility belt and shoulder harnesses were to blame for the injuries suffered while working.
They also complained movement was restricted by the clothing, making it harder to run, restrain and apprehend suspects, while driving and trying to get out of vehicles quickly was also difficult.
They also said their radios and personal protective equipment often got caught on seatbelts, doors, fences and furniture.
The report, initially carried out on the behalf of Tayside Police before the creation of Police Scotland last year, recommended looking into "gender-specific" summer and winter uniforms.
This is due to women being more susceptible to monthly body temperature changes, as well as symptoms of the menopause.
The report said: "Many officers are concerned about long term health issues through wearing the current uniform. Many described personal hygiene as being very important to them.
"Some officers suggest a quality designed uniform may assist with personal hygiene, reduce absence rates and in real terms save money."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article