SCOTTISH taxpayers will face a multi-billion-pound bill to pay for a new generation of nuclear weapons if plans to renew Trident are backed, according to a Holyrood minister.
The Westminster Government is due to make a decision about renewing the programme in 2016.
The Scottish Government has set out plans to remove Trident from Scotland if the country backs the Yes vote.
Veterans minister Keith Brown yesterday told MSPs the decision on renewal "appears to have been made", with the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Labour backing retention.
He added the cost of renewal will also have implications for the UK's conventional defence forces.
Mr Brown added: "The Scottish Government position is that Trident should be removed from an independent Scotland by 2020 - before we are hit with a share of the further £100 billion in lifetime costs, at 2012 prices, which are estimated for its replacement.
"We will also propose a constitutional prohibition on nuclear weapons being based in Scotland.
"As the Trident Commission reported, when spending reaches its peak in the next decade, taxpayers will be spending nearly £4bn a year on nuclear weapons at 2012 prices, the equivalent of swallowing up almost one third of the entire current defence capital budget - with clear implications for other defence projects.
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: "They (the SNP) imply you are not serious about nuclear disarmament unless you support independence. I would put aside that in this chamber we are all disarmers - some are multi-lateral disarmers, some are unilateral disarmers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article