PATIENTS are waiting three weeks to see a GP in some parts of Glasgow, it has emerged.
Lengthy waits are leading desperate patients to the doors of A&E for non-emergency treatment, heaping pressure on already overstretched hospital services.
The worrying picture emerged during NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde's annual review meeting yesterday, when one pensioner told the board he had waited 21 days for a GP appointment in the Springburn area.
Senior officials with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde admitted the board received "regular reports" about GP waiting times. The board also admitted that it would struggle to meet a four-hour A&E waiting times target in the foreseeable future.
Jackie Fox, from Ballornock, said patients from his area were resorting to casualty services because of delays to see their GP and said: "It is going to be very hard to break into the four-hour waits."
Keith Redpath, Interim Chief Officer at NHSGGC, said: "Access to GP services is something we receive regular reports on. I certainly recognise that if people can't access GP services, in some places it's easier to go to an alternative service.
"It is less that appropriate for people to turn up at A&E." Mr Redpath said the health board worked closed with GP services to monitor waiting times and resolve issues. Figures show that as of March 2014, 89.6% of patients waited four hours or less for A&E treatment at Glasgow's hospitals, falling well short of the 95% target.
A report published in May showed the number of patients waiting more than four hours in A&E has almost trebled in five years.
The government is now further away from reaching its target than before the last election, the analysis by Audit Scotland found.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article