The leading Scottish historian Sir Tom Devine, who is backing a Yes vote in the referendum, has said if the vote is No the SNP may "come to regret" rejecting a third option on the ballot paper.
Writing in the new London Review of Books, Professor Devine said that, with polls still showing the No voters ahead of Yes, a different strategy could have been pursued.
The historian writes that the initial preference of the Scottish Government was to have three questions, with "devo-max" added to the other two.
He writes: "The UK government was emphatically against that. Two questions it would have to be.
"Strong rumour suggests that Alex Salmond would have preferred to go for devo-max - which would undoubtedly have been accepted by a massive majority of the Scottish electorate - and then, after bedding down the new powers, to go to the country again in a few years' time on the final step of full sovereignty for Scotland.
"But the possibility of achieving the holy grail of Scottish independence in a single vote was just too tempting."
He concludes: "With the 'No' campaign still in the ascendancy as the day of reckoning looms, the pro-independence camp may yet come to regret its rejection of gradualism."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article