A LEADING legal body has urged the Scottish Government to reject a proposal to move Fatal Accident Inquiries out of the courts and into specially created centres.
The Faculty of Advocates has spoken out against the recommendation, which would see the creation of three "bespoke" centres - one in the North of Scotland, one in the East and one in the West.
In a Government consultation following a review into FAI legislation, the body - which represents Scotland's leading lawyers - said the move could cause difficulty for those living in remote or rural locations.
The faculty said: "We consider that limiting FAIs to three venues in Scotland is too restrictive, not least for the deceased's family who are likely to find it much easier and convenient to travel to the local sheriff court."
The 2009 review, carried out by Lord Cullen, recommended that FAIs be taken out of court buildings in order to provide a more relaxed atmosphere for bereaved families.
However, instead of using just three specialist centres, the Faculty said it is more in favour of using ad hoc accommodation, such as premises used by the Scottish Tribunals Service, which it claims would meet the non-court recommendation and also benefit court programming.
The Faculty added: "We agree that in principle, FAIs should not be confined to local courts.
"However, where the use of a building other than the local court would mean that the family of the deceased and the majority of witnesses would have to travel an unacceptably long way to attend the FAI - most likely, we anticipate, in remote or rural locations - we agree that the FAI should still be dealt with in the local court."
Another concern which was raised as part of the review was the length of time taken to hold an FAI after some deaths. The Faculty said it agreed with Lord Cullen that it was not "practical or realistic" to make it mandatory for an inquiry to begin within a certain time frame.
The response stated: "We would record, however, that we endorse Lord Cullen's statement that 'the delay in cases reaching a hearing is disheartening and frustrating for the relatives of the deceased. It also may cause distress to persons who may be the subject of criticism, whether or not well-founded, such as members of the staff of the Scottish Prison Service. It may also lead to loss of, or deterioration in, evidence'."
The body added that preliminary hearings should be held to speed up the process of FAIs.
It also backed a proposal to allow Fatal Accident Inquiries into deaths abroad, as well as plans to better enforce inquiry recommendations which would involve parties who do not comply with them being forced to explain why not.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article