WE'VE missed Alex Salmond at the diary.
Not the airbrushed media-trained Dr Jekyll of recent weeks, but the authentic sneering Mr Hyde. So what a joy yesterday when the latter made a surprise appearance at a press conference for the foreign press and got into a slanging match with the BBC's Nick Robinson. No snide was too petty, no sarcasm too undignified, no chuckle too superfluous. It made Kate Bush's comeback look like the testcard. And just as swooning aficionados thought it couldn't get better, the First Minister topped it off with: "We have approached this campaign with humility." Ah, vintage stuff!
ALSO spotted at the event was actor Brian Cox. The Dundonian once played Hannibal Lecter on screen, but is best remembered among the press corps for a rambling rant at the launch of Yes Scotland. As one hack recalled with a shudder at the sight: "I preferred him as a cannibal."
THE event of the day, however was undoubtedly the crazed BBC debate with 8,000 noisy teens at Glasgow Hydro, which lit up Twitter under the #BigBigDebate hashtag. The incisive comments of new voters included: "Think Nicola might fancy me", "@RuthDavidsonMSP talks a power of s***e" and, to George Galloway: "Get that hat aff ya daft p****." And those were the clean ones.
LABOUR peer Lord Robertson tells the diary not every Yes poster implies a Yes household. In Stirling's Raploch a woman demanded a No poster from him so she could put it in the window next to the Yes poster raised by her husband. While another woman voting No allegedly told canvassers she only had a Yes poster up "to keep these b******s away from the house." Which b******s, however, remains unclear.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article