NIGEL Farage's Ukip is the most trusted party to argue England's case for reform on how it is governed, according to Scottish researchers.
Experts at Edinburgh University conducted a study of 3700 adults which found a clear and growing dissatisfaction among English voters at the way the country, representing 84 per cent of the UK population, was governed, with a preference for an England-wide political institution to represent their interests.
Although David Cameron's preferred option of English votes for English laws (EVEL) had most support, when people were asked who best represented the interests of England, the Prime Minister and his party were well behind Mr Farage and Ukip.
When participants were asked which party best stands up for the interests of England, the Tories were placed fourth on 16 per cent, Labour were on 17, none of the above on 19 but Ukip came out on top with 23 per cent. The Liberal Democrats received just four per cent.
Much the same pattern was seen in terms of the party leaders.
When asked which one best stood up for English interests, Mr Farage was placed first with 22 per cent, seven ahead of David Cameron.
Co-author Professor Charlie Jeffery of the ESRC Centre on Constitutional Change at Edinburgh University, said: "There is a clear and growing sense of English political identity.
"We found this is driven in part by two factors: a feeling that the devolved nations, especially Scotland, have an unfair advantage over England and two, related, concerns about the influence of the EU and the impact of immigration."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article