POLICE fear the way they deal with body-mounted digital cameras may fail to meet data protection laws.
The national force is looking at options for extending the use of the controversial "officer-worn CCTV" system across the country.
But internal documents reveal concerns over the legality of the bodycams, which are only routinely used in the north-east.
A draft review of CCTV policy said: "The management of these devices at a number of different offices is questionable in regards to compliance with the Information Commissioner's Office guidance."
The former Grampian Police force bought such cameras for its officers - and smaller numbers have been used in other parts of the country, including by the entirely separate British Transport Police, which patrols railways.
Provision of such cameras, the report said, was "disparate". It added: "A decision from Senior Management Team is required as to the corporate way forward and the introduction of a Standard Operating Procedure to ensure officers are aware of their roles and responsibilities with regards to legislative compliance."
These concerns are understood to focus on where and when the cameras can be used and, more importantly, on how any resulting images are stored and handled.
Senior officers believe bodycams could be a vital tool in gathering evidence and protecting the public from misbehaviour by officers and officers from false allegations by the public.
A police spokesman said: "We are considering options for the use of body-worn videos, building on the experience we have in using them across the Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire and Moray Divisions."
Aberdeen city commander, Chief Superintendent Adrian Watson, said: "The cameras have helped to bring about earlier guilty pleas - which means officers are able to spend less time in court and more time out and about in communities."
A study in England - where data protection legislation is the same as in Scotland - was published on Wednesday, showing body cameras helped secure convictions in tough and complicated cases, such as domestic abuse.
The study, carried out in Essex after a four-month trial, found a significantly higher proportion of people were charged with an offence when officers wore cameras, compared with other sanctions, such as a penalty or community resolution.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article