A SCOTTISH neo-creationist group has been accused of seeking to spread "disinformation" among children by calling for theories that deny evolution to be taught in science lessons.
The Centre for Intelligent Design (C4ID), based in Glasgow, claims evolution should be taught "objectively" in schools.
But critics say creationist views should only be discussed in the context of religious education and are demanding guidance for teachers to ensure it does not happen in science classes.
The C4ID, which opened around four years ago, expressed its views in response to a petition submitted to the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Secular Society.
The petition, to be heard on November 11, calls for official guidance to be issued in schools barring the presentation of creationist and Young Earth doctrines as viable alternatives to the science of evolution. It has been backed by three Nobel-winning British scientists - Sir Harold Kroto, Sir Richard Roberts and Sir John Sulston.
There was an outcry last year after it emerged members of US creationist religious sect the West Mains Church of Christ had worked as classroom assistants for eight years at Kirktonholme Primary in East Kilbride. Children were given books intended to debunk evolution.
Last week, Pope Francis stepped into the evolution debate, saying he believes in the Big Bang theory and God was not a "magician with a magic wand able to do everything".
Alastair Noble, director of C4ID, said his organisation believed the petition was based on imposing a "particular world view" and would inhibit legitimate discussion in science lessons. He acknowledged the idea of teaching "for and against" evolution would be controversial, but claimed it was consistent with scientific method.
"Scientific theories are always an approximation to the ultimate truth, some of which is beyond our capacity to understand," he said. "So no scientific theory should ever be accorded a privileged position.
"To give to evolution a status that no other scientific theory has is unscientific - so therefore the objections to evolution should be explored in universities and schools … I don't see why debating whether a scientific theory is valid or not is a problem. That is the nature of science."
Noble said the work of C4ID was not specifically targeted at the classroom, but he "occasionally" spoke in schools in both science classes and religious education classes.
The basis of intelligent design, which has been dubbed neo-creationism, is that life on Earth has come through the actions of an intelligent designer - which most proponents believe to be God.
Noble says intelligent design is "hugely misunderstood" and claims it is not creationism as it is not fundamentally a religious position.
He said while there was evidence for adaptation within species, the same could not be argued for "macro-evolution" - major evolutionary changes over time.
Noble added: "The evidence for adaptation is largely solid and uncontroversial, but the … theory of evolution, that random mutations can produce complex life, is highly speculative and has never been demonstrated."
Paul Braterman is an honorary senior research fellow in chemistry at Glasgow University and committee member of the British Centre for Science Education (BCSE), a campaign to keep religion out of science classes. He said C4ID is using "tired" arguments for intelligent design which "is merely a stalking horse for creationism".
"By calling into question the evidence for what they describe as macro-evolution - which most of us would simply include under the term evolution - C4ID have raised the stakes," he said. "Either the [petition] committee must accept their contention that the evidence for macro-evolution and common descent is inconclusive and reject our petition, or they must agree with the overwhelming scientific evidence in favour of common descent and reject what is in reality a plea by C4ID for a licence to spread disinformation among schoolchildren."
The Rev Michael Roberts, a spokesman for BCSE, said creationists commonly made direct factual claims based on spurious science.
He added: "The creationist tactic is to present their point of view as having an equal claim to be heard, thus appealing to reasonableness and fair play … We would not accept such an argument in the case of Flat Earthism, and should not accept it in the case of evolution denial or old Earth denial either."
Spencer Fildes, chairman of the Scottish Secular Society, said its concerns were about protecting science. "If you are in religious and moral education or outwith the science classroom, then by all means you can philosophise about this," he said. "Students and children are welcome to discuss it, as long as it is contextual.
"Unfortunately, the problem we have is that this does not happen, hence the reason why we have raised the petition."
In England and Wales, teaching creationism and intelligent design as scientific theories in schools is banned.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article