CAMPAIGNERS calling for the abolition of home care charges for disabled or elderly people say the cost to local authorities would be much less than they have estimated.
They argue the Exchequer could see a net gain from the abolition of fees for care such as help with getting up, mealtimes and day care.
The Scotland Against the Care Tax campaign has published analysis that claims such a move would not leave a £50 million hole in local authority budgets - as council chiefs say - but would in fact cost less than half that.
The campaign argues much of the value of care charges is absorbed by the costs of collecting them. Meanwhile it says charges bring hidden costs to services, including lost tax income from informal carers who cannot work.
Care charges also cause increased costs to health and social services, it says, because some who feel they cannot afford them opt out of preventative services, leading their health to deteriorate, so they become hospitalised or require other more costly treatment later.
However, a spokesman for local authorities body Cosla was scathing about the report. "This is a highly speculative document that fails to understand how local authorities administer charges," he said.
"The proposition that councils have a dedicated resource to collect social work charges is nonsense. Very often councils will use council-wide services to collect charges and so the officers who are responsible for social work services are also employed to recover other charges for council services. So it is unrealistic to suggest savings will be realised simply by removing community care charges."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article