A genetic fingerprint study has provided strong evidence of the MRSA superbug spreading from farm animals to hospitals and baby clinics in the UK.
Scientists identified three samples of the drug-resistant bacteria from a hospital and neonatal unit in the west of Scotland that closely matched a specific strain found in livestock.
Generally, people and animals harbour different forms of the potent MRSA strain CC398 investigated by the researchers. However, the new evidence suggests the livestock version has found its way into hospitals.
Study leader Dr Melissa Ward, from Edinburgh University, said: "Our findings emphasise the need for strict biosecurity practices in the food production industry, as well as continued surveillance and infection control of MRSA in hospitals."
MRSA is a serious hazard in healthcare settings. The CC398 strain can cause life-threatening infections.
Dr Ward's team unravelled the genetic codes of British CC398 samples and compared them with data on the same bugs from humans and livestock around the world.
The most significant evidence of animal-to-human transmission came from sequences of MRSA collected in Scotland. Two were from samples taken six months apart from a neonatal ward in Greater Glasgow and Clyde. The third was from a cleaning project at a Glasgow hospital.
Writing in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology, the scientists concluded: "It is possible that this finding represents the persistence of the livestock-associated strain of CC398 in hospital settings in the UK, with onward transmission between humans"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article