Between half and two-thirds of people using food banks do so because of benefits sanctions and delays, a new study has found.
The survey of more than 1000 foodbank users across the UK was carried out by Oxfam, Child Poverty Action Group, the Church of England and the Trussell Trust.
Its findings challenge the insistence by the UK Government that welfare reforms and cuts are not the reason for the huge increase in foodbank use across the UK.
The number of people receiving three days' supplies from food banks increased from almost 129,000 in 2011-12 to more than 913,000 a year later, Trussell Trust figures show. In Scotland foodbank use rose from 5726 users to 71,428 last year.
Researchers found that between half and two thirds of users reported a specific problem with benefits. Of these 28-24 per cent were waiting for a benefit claim which had not been decided, 19-28 per cent had had payments stopped due to an alleged breach of job centre rules and 9-11 per cent had had Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) stopped because they were found 'fit for work'.
The report calls for increased access to hardship payments, improvements to ESA, and better support, especially at jobcentres.
However campaigners also said the Scottish government and other Scottish authorities could do more to mitigate the impact of welfare cuts and other financial crises facing families.
The report found many foodbank users are not aware of crisis payments they could receive, and few are using them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article