NIGEL Farage has been forced into damage-limitation after Ukip's Rochester and Strood by-election candidate Mark Reckless suggested EU migrants settled in the UK could be forced to leave if Britain quit the 28-member bloc.
Despite the controversy, which the Ukip leader dismissed as a "minor cause for confusion", the Tories appear to have resigned themselves to losing the Kent seat in today's poll. The bookies put the Conservative defector odds-on to win.
Yet, privately, Labour is just as worried about the impact Ukip could have on its chances at the General Election, particularly in northern English seats.
This week, it pushed out not one but two keynote pledges on immigration; introducing 1,000 more border staff and restricting eligibility of unemployment benefits to EU nationals from three months to two years.
Ed Miliband is hoping his party's vote at Rochester - which until 2005 before boundary changes was a Labour seat - will hold up while Nick Clegg is bracing himself for another Liberal Democrat lost deposit.
Mr Reckless, who had a 10,000 majority as a Tory MP in the Kent seat, sparked controversy after it emerged he told a hustings meeting that EU nationals would probably be granted work permits for a "fixed period" if the UK left the EU.
Asked specifically what he thought should happen to a Polish plumber who lived in the Rochester area and whose children went to school there, the Ukip candidate replied: "In the near term, we'd have to have a transitional period. We should probably allow people who are currently here to have a work permit at least for a fixed period. People, who have been here a long time and integrated in that way, we'd want to look sympathetically at."
l MPs last night approved the controversial European Arrest Warrant in a symbolic vote brought forward by Labour to try to embarrass the UK Government ahead of today's by-election. Some 29 rebels voted against it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article