A SENIOR Labour backbencher has warned that the party is "culturally adrift" from its own core supporters in the wake of the Rochester snobbery row.
David Lammy, a London mayoral hopeful and former Universities Minister, said politicians from "liberal, professional backgrounds" found it hard to identify with ordinary working people.
His intervention comes as Ed Miliband struggles to draw a line under the furore that forced Emily Thornberry's resignation as Shadow Attorney General last week. The Labour leader has undertaken a media offensive to insist his party still represents ordinary, working people. Ms Thornberry tweeted a picture of a house covered with three St George flags and a white van parked outside. The image, taken while she was campaigning for the by-election in Rochester and Strood, was widely interpreted as sneering at the family who lived there.
Labour came third in the contest and victor Ukip is threatening to make inroads into the party's traditional heartlands elsewhere.
But Mr Lammy stressed his colleague's tweet was merely a symptom. "The Labour Party feels culturally adrift, not just from large parts of Britain but from its own traditional working class base," he declared.
"Large parts of the country feel that Labour not only disagrees with them, they think we disapprove of them too."
The MP, who grew up on a council estate close to Tottenham's infamous Broadwater Farm, argued Labour's "discomfort hinges on immigration". He explained: "By and large, modern Labour politicians come from liberal, professional backgrounds. They have benefited from globalisation; they mix in social circles with people who work in multinational firms, enjoy foreign travel and find diversity enriching. Much of Labour's traditional electoral base does not feel this way."
Diane Abbott, his Labour colleague, said Mr Miliband had "made a mistake" in sacking fellow London MP Ms Thornberry, making the story bigger than it otherwise would have been.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article