THE chief of Britain's naval staff should be sacked for suggesting that Royal Navy warships may not be built in the UK, an MP has said.
Labour's John Robertson, who represents the Clyde shipyards in Glasgow North West, called for First Sea Lord Admiral Sir George Zambellas to be sacked for putting his constituents' futures in doubt.
Scottish Affairs Committee chairman Ian Davidson joked about whether Sir George had "walked the plank", and called for the admiral to appear before his committee.
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael assured the pair that the decisions on where British warships are built rests with ministers.
The row erupted after Sir George was quoted in industry publication Defence News suggesting the contract to build the Type 26 Global Combat Ship should not "necessarily" go to British industry.
During Scotland questions in the Commons, Mr Robertson said: "As the MP for the construction yards on the Clyde, where £200 million has been said will be invested to turn it into a state-of-the-art (facility), and where there's thousands of jobs at risk, is it not time the First Sea Lord was sacked for putting my constituents, the people who work in my yard, into such a position of worry?"
Mr Carmichael replied: "I cannot overemphasise the decisions on these contracts are made by ministers, the ministers are quite clear that our complex warships are only built in the United Kingdom."
Earlier, Mr Davidson quipped: "Has the admiral been keelhauled, walked the plank? Or would it be better if he was invited to meet the Scottish Affairs Select Committee?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article