Proposals to allow victims and witnesses to pre-record video statements rather than give evidence in court are being considered by legal officials.
It is thought it could help reduce the length of trials and the impact on victims and witnesses.
The proposal is being considered as part of a review by the Scottish Court Service (SCS) of how proceedings could be simplified and modernised, taking advantage of new technologies available, to help secure fairer, more efficient and effective trials.
The review is in the early stages and is expected to report in spring 2015.
SCS chief executive Eric McQueen said: "At the moment, we largely rely on witnesses coming to court on the day of the trial.
"One of the areas we are looking at within this review is at the use of more pre-recorded evidence and for that evidence to be in a video format.
"Quite clearly this would be a big change and we are still at the early stage of research and discussions.
"If taken forward, it would require a change of culture, practice and legislation, but it is one of the ways we are looking to reduce trial times and the impact on victims and witnesses."
Victim Support Scotland welcomed the proposal.
Spokesman David Sinclair said: "We are generally supportive of the idea. It is an assistance to victims and witnesses.
"Many people are frightened to appear in court and give evidence. This perhaps approaches it from a better angle."
However, some legal experts were not convinced by the proposal and said that witnesses would still need to be cross-examined in court.
Brian McConnachie QC, chairman of the Scottish Criminal Bar Association, said: "I have great doubts as to what the actual point of is. There has been a suggestion that it would mean people potentially didn't have to turn up for court.
"I don't follow that logic. If the evidence that somebody is to be giving is controversial then whether they pre-record it or not they are going to have to turn up in order to be cross-examined and the jury are going to have to be able to see how they react to that cross-examination."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article