Motorists in Glasgow face being barred from using bus lanes at all times of the day and night under plans being considered by the council.
Key stakeholders have been invited to share their views as Glasgow City Council undertakes a review of its bus lanes, with an emphasis on whether to introduce blanket operating hours to reduce confusion among motorists.
In letters sent out just before Christmas, interested parties were told: "Consideration is being given to standardising the operating times of all the bus/taxi lanes in the city. This would make the operation of the bus/taxi lanes easier for everyone to understand."
They were asked to consider the merits of three possible options under the standardisation plans, which included: converting all existing bus/taxi lanes to 7am to 7pm; making all bus/taxi lanes 24/7; or making all bus/taxi lanes peak hours only.
The questionnaire went on to ask whether they believed switching to standard timings "would benefit driver understanding" and if they could foresee "any other benefits or issues" from the move.
At present, bus lanes in Glasgow - which can also be used by taxis - have differing operating hours, leading to complaints that it was too confusing for drivers.
Motorists snapped driving in bus lanes during restricted hours face an automatic £60 fine, halved to £30 if they pay up within two weeks.
Neil Greig, director of policy at the Institute of Advanced Motorists and one of the people asked to respond to the consultation, said: "I think it [standardisation] does make sense. It solves a lot of problems, because if you missed the sign with the timings on it - maybe because it was obscured by a bus or by overgrown trees - now you would have no excuse to say 'I didn't realise it was operational'. If the hours are the same across the board, it will cut out confusion."
Mr Greig said the IAM favoured a 7am-7pm policy.
The consultation paper also seeks views on what peak hours should be, whether the lanes are required on Sundays and if there were any areas of the city where the lanes should be either scrapped or introduced.
However, Mr Greig added that council bosses should also consider copying the example set by Liverpool, where all but four city centre bus lanes were axed at the end of last year following a nine-month pilot which temporarily rid the city of all its bus lanes to test the effect on traffic flow. It concluded that bus lanes provided only a "marginal benefit".
"If Glasgow are taking the time to review the bus lanes they should go the whole hog and decide whether they are needed at all," said Mr Greig. "That way drivers would know that if they are there, they are there for a reason."
Glasgow was the first city in Scotland to bring in bus lane cameras when they launched at 11 different sites in April 2012, with an additional five activated in October 2013.
They have so far generated millions of pounds in fines, although council bosses stress that the cash is being reinvested into the city's infrastructure and that the number of fixed penalty notices being issued has declined as compliance among motorists improves.
Edinburgh City Council carried out its own bus lane review last year which recommended switching "all-day" bus lanes - those operating from morning to evening - to peak hours only, and allowing motorcyclists to use them too.
The city also has a small number of 24-hour lanes which were retained.
A spokeswoman for Glasgow City Council said: "Driving in bus lanes has always been an offence for anyone but authorised vehicles. However, the review, which is nearing completion, is about making it clear to drivers when bus lanes can, if at all, be used by unauthorised vehicles."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article