THE Labour leader's bust-ups with business leaders could boost his popularity with voters, a poll has suggested, but Ed Miliband is still well behind David Cameron when it comes to who people think would best safeguard the British economy.
A Comres survey showed that 49 per cent of people said the Labour chief's rows with captains of industry showed he was on the voters' side. By contrast, just 27 per cent agreed with David Cameron that the rows had exposed Mr Miliband as a danger to the economy.
Labour was rated the best party for standing up to big business by a margin of 30 per cent to 22 per cent over the Conservatives.
But voters were split 40-40 over whether or not it was more important for a prime minister to have a good relationship with big business or stand up to its excesses.
On the wider issue of economic credibility, Mr Miliband received only 25 per cent support, considerably behind both Mr Cameron with 39 per cent and George Osborne with 34 per cent on being trusted to see the country through the current economic situation.
The poll was taken in the wake of comments from business leaders like Boots Chief Executive Stefano Pessina and ex-Marks & Spencer boss Lord Rose, warning that a Labour government would be bad for business.
Yet it also found 41 per cent of those taking part thought the businessmen were speaking out because they were personally worried that they would have to pay more tax if Mr Miliband became Prime Minister.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article