A COMPENSATION scheme set up by the Government for those made ill by their workplace has been described as an "unholy mess" which needs urgent reform.
A report by health researchers at Stirling University found the system only covers a tiny proportion of those affected by occupational cancers and other fatal diseases. Among them are breast cancer linked to shift work and lung cancer related to welding and diesel exhaust.
The study questions why these conditions are not on the list of industrial diseases for which state compensation, known as the industrial injuries disablement benefit (IIDB), is payable.
This is despite their inclusion in official cancer prevention priority rankings produced by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) in 2012, the report said.
Professor Andrew Watterson, from the university's occupational and environmental health research group, said: "The industrial injuries disablement benefit scheme excludes many conditions and those that are covered tend to be subject to claim-barring disability thresholds, minimum exposure times and job restrictions."
HSE data indicates that there are almost 13,600 new cases of occupational cancer each year, the study said, yet in 2012 IIDB was paid in just 2,600 cases.
If asbestos-related cancers are not included, just 90 payouts were made.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: "The Industrial Injuries Scheme covers a wide range of diseases known to be a risk from certain jobs and is based on evidence and consultation with experts.
"The Advisory Council continues to monitor emerging research to provide independent advice to ministers."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article