A remote Highland community is pleading with Scottish ministers to allow a controversial wind farm, which is opposed by conservationists.
Strathy and Armadale Community Council in the north of Sutherland believes SSE's plan for the £100m Strathy South, 39 turbine wind farm, will invigorate the area's economy on a scale never before thought possible and help stem depopulation.
In particular that it would expand the existing 33 turbine Strathy North scheme, which has created jobs and generates more than £170,000 a year for community projects.
A public inquiry into the 39 turbine development opens next week in Strathy Village Hall and Community Council Chair Janette Mackay says she is hopeful the voice of the local people will be heard.
She said "I fear that the voice of communities trying to live and work in this part of Highland Sutherland is often ignored by outside parties like the RSPB. Strathy and Armadale Community Council is very supportive of the Strathy South wind farm proposal because it would offer great investment for our fragile rural economy including jobs for our young folk and opportunities for local businesses. SSE is a company we trust that is already providing real benefit to our community through the Strathy North wind farm."
But she said this was not the only reason community councillors were supportive. "We are keenly aware that our Flow Country is so precious and we welcome the major environmental restoration proposal being put forward as a core element of the Strathy South project. The plans would see experts restore and manage 3,200 hectares of long-damaged peatland around the wind farm site, on a scale we could never have dreamed possible, let alone affordable."
George Campbell, Highland Regional Director, of RSPB Scotland had every sympathy with local people wishing to see investment in their communities.
"However we believe strongly that the development of a wind farm at Strathy South is simply the wrong approach to take. Strathy South lies in the very heart of the internationally important habitats of the Flow Country, a peatland ecosystem important for birds and which is increasingly valued as a carbon store.
"That is why many conservation organisations including the Scottish Wildlife Trust, Plantlife Scotland and the government's own advisors, Scottish Natural Heritage, are recommending refusal of the application by SSE. "
He said RSPB "emphatically" believed there was a role for renewable energy projects, but they had to be in the right locations.
The area in question is home to iconic, but threatened species like red-throated divers, hen harriers, greenshanks and the rare, wood sandpiper.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article