LIVES could be saved if firemen are allowed to treat people who suffer heart attacks at the scene, according to a leading fire inspector.
Steven Torrie, the chief inspector within the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS), has said they should be entrusted to carry out emergency medical care.
His proposals mirror the procedures in Seattle where 40 per cent of those who suffer a heart attack in the street are saved, largely due to intervention from the fire service.
Comparatively, the survival rate for Scotland is four per cent - one of the worst in Europe.
Mr Torrie argued that due to their fire crews are more community-based, meaning they would be able to attend cardiac arrests quicker than ambulances 'nine times out of ten'.
He said: "[Firefighters] are trained and they can be trained further. They have hundreds of defibrillator devices between them and they could contribute in a big way.
"The process is straightforward but it could make a big difference to Scotland's health."
He added: "We are prepared to speak, and are speaking, to the fire service about looking at all the issues properly before we roll out the cardiac arrest service."
Scottish ministers announced plans to save 1,000 lives from out-of-hospital heart attacks by 2020. They are to equip a further 500,000 with CPR skills and provide more random access defibrillators.
However, Stephen Thomson, of the Fire Brigades Union, warned that if allowed to assist paramedics then firefighters could be faced with medical emergencies beyond their training.
He said: "I was given the anecdotal example of a crew that was turned out for a call that they realised was not for a cardiac arrest but for a diabetic coma.
"Firefighters are not trained for that and do not have the expertise to deal with it. Those issues need to be looked at."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article