SCOTLAND'S largest health board is to create a second post in less than a year dedicated to increasing the number of objections to alcohol licences and curtail the sale of drink.
In the latest move in its campaign against the alcohol industry, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) is to fund an officer whose sole remit is to assist community groups in lodging appeals against the sale of liquor in their neighbourhoods.
The successful candidate for the new role, which comes with a salary of up to £28,000, will give advice to community councils and groups such as tenants and residents' associations on how to legally frame objections to licence applications.
Glasgow has 1,700 licensed premises, with an estimated 13,500 problem alcohol users and 300 drink-related deaths annually.
NHS GGC said the applicant, who will be appointed next month, would "create and provide the information, training and support needed to allow communities to have a voice within the statutory processes that regulate the sale of alcohol within Glasgow city".
It comes less than a year after the board appointed a £40,000-a-year officer to bring specific health concerns to licensing boards when applications are made, with a view to limiting the sale of alcohol.
The job, the first of its type in Scotland, aimed to bring forensic and legal rigour to licensing objections from the NHS, which continues to have very mixed results in its attempts to force itself on the agenda.
An update report on how the post has performed has found it has made just five letters of objection and one letter of representation to Glasgow's licensing board to date.
But it has successfully called for a formal champion for those in various communities looking to restrict alcohol sales in their areas.
Sarah Graham, NHS GGC's lead on alcohol licensing, said: "An emerging theme from the Alcohol Licensing Lead role is that of a need for more knowledge and understanding of licensing within communities, community councils as well as a wider range of agencies, to enable them to participate more effectively and regularly in the process.
"A bid was placed with the Alcohol and Drug Partnership for funding for a post to develop the community response to licensing within Glasgow city.
"The post is currently being advertised with an interview date scheduled in early June. This post will provide
information, guidance and support to develop the community response to licensing."
The post comes on the back of publication of a new report calling for an overall of licensing administration to make
it more public-friendly.
The paper, by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and Alcohol Focus Scotland, said that although the licensing system has ways for communities to influence the amount of alcohol available in their area, in practice, it was often difficult to do this. It said that as a result, communities were not as involved as they could be if the processes were simpler.
It said community groups and individuals did not have the same resources as organisations including the licensee, health boards or the police, to engage with the licensing process and that "information needs to be tailored to community groups if they are to be involved in a meaningful way".
It called for community representatives to be given training to be able to participate in the city's licensing forum, 'planning gains' where licensed premises would have to "deliver benefits to the community to compensate for the harm associated with the extra local availability of alcohol" and a reduction in the formality of licensing board meetings.
But the report has been criticised for the practical hurdles it would create, failure to engage with the trade and repeated misspelling of 'licence'.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article