Households' confidence in their spending power took a step backwards in April in the run-up to the general election, a report has found.
The Lloyds Spending Power report had shown overall confidence at an all-time high in March - but the index reading fell back by three points to 155 in April as the general election loomed.
People's feelings towards their current and future financial situations levelled off during April, with political uncertainty potentially holding back confidence in people's personal finances, their household finances and the country's finances, which all fell back, the research found.
For the first time in 2015 so far, people's confidence in their future situation also fell. Lloyds said that people's expected future spending remains "stable", with about two-thirds (65per cent) of people surveyed not expecting their spending habits to be different in six months' time.
Despite the pause in the recent improvements seen to people's confidence levels, households' overall financial confidence still remained close to record high levels, according to the report, which started in early 2011.
Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures recently showed that inflation turned negative for the first time in more than half a century last month.
Chancellor George Osborne hailed the ONS figures as "good news for family budgets". The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation dipped to minus 0.1per cent, the ONS said.
Economists broadly expect the latest figure to bounce back to a positive number for May rather than heralding a persistent spiral of falling prices.
The Lloyds survey asks 2,000 bank account holders about their current and future spending habits, and how their commitments affect their spending power.
Claire Garrod, head of personal current accounts at Lloyds Bank, said: "Spending power paused for breath in April, with the political uncertainty in the UK seeming to impact financial confidence, which dropped back compared to March.
"However, despite this backwards step, confidence remains at a very high level and has been on an upward trend in 2015."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article