FORMER Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill has admitted that the SNP did not allow prisoners to vote in the independence referendum because the party feared "lurid headlines" in the run up to the crucial vote.
The MSP has urged the Scottish Government to review what he described as a "shameful" position if it was to have credibility in its opposition to David Cameron's plan to scrap the Human Rights Act.
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a blanket ban on prisoners voting is a breach of human rights.
Writing in the pro-independence newspaper The National, Mr MacAskill said: "Shamefully, the Scottish Government has so far refused to adhere to the spirit and the judgements of the European Courts.
"Initially it hid behind the franchise being reserved to Westminster but did indicate that it did not support its extension to prisoners. That was compounded by replicating the Westminster line in the franchise for the referendum. Votes were granted for 16 and 17-year-olds but not prisoners.
"In that act I am as complicit as any as the former justice secretary. It was the wrong thing done, albeit for the right reasons. It was to avoid any needless distractions in the run-up to the referendum, to deny the right-wing press lurid headlines that could tarnish the bigger picture.
"To have credibility on the issue the Scottish Government must now review their position on votes for prisoners or the defence of the Human Rights Act will ring hollow."
The Scottish Liberal Democrats hit out at Mr MacAskill for blocking the party's moves to give some prisoners the vote in the referendum and failing to act in seven years as justice secretary.
John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister, said the Scottish Government had "no plans" to change its position over the issue, with powers over Scottish elections set to be devolved to Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article