HEALTH Minister Shona Robison has rejected calls for a full judicial inquiry into a health board amid claims that it is stifling whistleblowers.
A letter signed by 36 senior clinicians at NHS Grampian urged the health board to reinstate two suspended Aberdeen Royal Infirmary surgeons, Professor Zyg Krukowski, a surgeon to the Queen, and his colleague, Dr. Wendy Craig.
Prof Krukowski has been suspended pending an investigation into "serious allegations", which have not been disclosed.
Their fellow doctors claim the health board punishes staff for whistleblowing and called on Ms Robison to intervene.
The letter states: "NHS Grampian has resorted to similar disciplinary action on previous occasions in relation to doctors raising legitimate clinical concerns which have resulted in major disruption to patient care and considerable cost to the public purse.
"For example a recent action against a group of consultants in Ophthalmology resulted in serious damage being inflicted on the department, with the loss of several outstanding staff members including the enforced retirement of the Professor of Ophthalmology.
"A Freedom of Information request to NHS Grampian has revealed that over two million pounds has been spent on locum fees and private treatment in the last three years as a direct consequence."
A Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) review released in December said problems with leadership and culture at the ARI were jeopardising care.
Responding to the doctors, Ms Robison said the current disciplinary process needed to "conclude without interference".
She added: "Legislation protects whistleblowers from suffering any detriment in relation to their employment position. NHS Scotland is leading work to develop an honest and open reporting culture, where all staff have the confidence to speak up without fear."
In a statement, NHS Grampian said: "We cannot - and will not - discuss matters involving individual members of staff.
"In light of this, we cannot comment on the factual accuracy of the contents of the letter.
It added that locum doctors were "a necessary expense for any health board".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article