MINISTERS have called for an agreement on standardised testing of primary pupils to improve levels of school scrutiny.
Angela Constance, the Education Secretary, issued the call as she gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament's education committee on new legislation to close the attainment gap between rich and poor.
An Audit Scotland report from 2014 found there were no comparable measures available at a council and national level on the performance of pupils from P1-S3.
And Professor Sue Ellis, from Strathclyde University's school of education, has already told the committee councils should be provided with a national bank of tests.
Responding to criticisms that the Bill was "pious thinking masquerading as legislation" Ms Constance said: "We know that most local authorities do some sort of standardised assessment, but what we really need that line of sight on is in terms of what is happening in a classroom, to what is happening in a school, to what is happening in a local authority to what is happening at a national level.
"We know that various local authorities have different forms of standardised assessment and what we really need now to do is have an agreement on standardised assessment so that we can get that line of sight about what is happening at a very local level to what is happening at a national level.
"Comparisons between local authorities are indeed difficult because different local authorities are using different forms of standardised assessments and I therefore don't consider it pious for the government to be working towards a national improvement framework so that we get that clear line of sight. I would consider that purposeful and pragmatic."
The minister went on to defended the creation of the controversial post of statutory chief education officer, but stressed it would not necessarily mean councils appointing a new individual if there was already someone doing that job.
In 2003, the former Labour-led Scottish Executive scrapped national testing because of the concern teachers had become overly-focused on "teaching to the test" rather than educating pupils.
As a result, the national survey of five to 14 attainment, which tested every pupil in primary school and the first two years of secondary school, was replaced by a system of scientific sampling to track the performance of a proportion of pupils.
There have been concerns since then that the education system is now short of information that reveals how well primary schools are performing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article