A City trader has become the first person to be convicted by a jury of rigging Libor rates in a scandal that shook financial markets.
Tom Hayes, 35, was the "ringmaster" in an enormous fraud to manipulate the benchmark interest rates.
The highly-paid ex-trader at UBS and Citigroup orchestrated a scheme to interfere with the rate in order to boost his own six-figure earnings, London's Southwark Crown Court heard.
In an audio clip he said "influencing" Libor was "commonplace" and admitted he was a "serial offender".
He had denied eight counts of conspiracy to defraud covering a period from 2006 to 2010, when he worked for Switzerland's UBS and America's Citigroup.
But a jury of seven men and five women found Hayes, of Fleet, Hampshire, guilty of all eight counts.
Hayes stared straight ahead emotionless as the verdicts were read out.
His wife and parents sat with their heads bowed as they heard the verdicts.
A string of banks including Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank have been fined billions of pounds for their part in the Libor scandal.
Dozens of traders have been fired and one person, whose name and bank cannot be reported, has pleaded guilty to their role.
A two-month trial heard Hayes, who has been on legal aid, was at the helm of a plot to rig Libor that "struck at the very integrity of that system".
Described by the judge Mr Justice Cooke as "by nature a gambler", he was driven by a thirst for money.
He told investigators after his arrest in December 2012: "You want every little bit of money you can possibly get."
Mukul Chawla QC, prosecuting, said Hayes would "cajole", "beg" and "bribe" brokers through "corrupt" trades to help manipulate Libor.
He said: "On an almost daily basis he set out to dishonestly manipulate or rig Libor at his bank and other banks."
Hayes built up a network of traders to help him carry out the fraud, even attempting to drag his younger stepbrother Peter O'Leary in.
Hayes encouraged him to buy a "few drinks'' for his colleague at HSBC in an effort to influence where the bank set its yen Libor rate.
And Hayes once offered to pay a contact 100,000 US dollars if he kept the Libor rate as low as possible.
Mr Chawla said: "He behaved in a thoroughly dishonest and manipulative manner by repeatedly cheating those with whom he had entered into huge financial transactions.
"The motive was a simple one: it was greed."
The prosecutor added: "He was the ringmaster at the very centre, telling others around him what to do and in a number of cases rewarding them for their dishonest assistance."
Hayes, described as "extremely intelligent", worked for Royal Bank of Scotland and Royal Bank of Canada before joining UBS in 2006 as a trader in Tokyo.
He was paid £1.3 million before tax in salary and incentives by UBS from September 2006 to December 2009.
He joined Citi in 2009 after he "felt that UBS were not paying him enough", and received £3.5 million before tax for just nine months' work.
The prosecutor said Hayes immediately set about rigging Libor in his new job. He sent a message on his first day trading with UBS, on September 29 2006, saying: "Do me a favour and get the Libor rate up?"
A trader in yen Libor derivatives, he effectively bet on movements of the daily rate at which banks are able to borrow from each other.
He rigged the submissions made by the panel banks, used to calculate that rate.
He was sacked after his methods were formally reported to senior management.
He was arrested in the UK in December 2012.
Hayes, who has mild Asperger's syndrome, admitted his part but claimed it was not dishonest and his bosses knew what he was doing.
He faces the possibility of being extradited to the US where he was charged over Libor rigging in December 2012.
He will be sentenced shortly.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article