A victory for Jeremy Corbyn would be a boost to the SNP’s bid for Scottish independence, Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, has warned.
She said, faced with the prospect of the left-winger winning the Labour leadership contest: "The Conservative in me is delighted; the Unionist in me is crying into my beer."
After Mr Corbyn described himself as a “Socialist not a Unionist” and revealed that he had not campaigned once to save the United Kingdom during last year’s referendum campaign, Ms Davidson said that if he won the race for the Labour crown, then he would “run up the white flag on our Union”.
Ahead of a keynote economic speech in London, the MSP said: “The more the politics of the rest of the UK looks like a foreign country than Scotland, the easier it is for the SNP to try and paint that Englishness and otherness they do so effectively and disgracefully.
"Having a neo-Marxist in a Breton cap talking about 1970s politics just takes us further away from where Scotland is."
Ms Davidson said, among the Labour candidates, she most admired the outsider Liz Kendall’s “directness, decisiveness and tenacity”, admitting also: “She would be the one I would fear most,” adding with a laugh: “Such a shame she is going to come fourth.”
The party leader described Yvette Cooper’s campaign as lacklustre and bereft of any dynamic policy offer.
“She had a real come-through-the-middle strategy of being everybody’s second choice…If you are going to be a leadership contender, you have to be prepared to lead…Her campaign has been about not wanting to be everybody’s last choice rather than being anybody’s first choice.”
Ms Davidson said if a female candidate were to win the Labour leadership, then the atmosphere in the Commons chamber would be very different.
“It’s much easier for a male leader in a very combative chamber like the Commons to take on another male and attack them; you can’t do that with women. You look either feart or weak if they beat you. The dynamics would change hugely if there was a female leader,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel